【Questions】

I live in my dad's apartment as a mistress.Papa only comes when he feels like it.My dad has a date with another child, but when I signed a mistress contract, I was told to quit dad activity and stop meeting other men, and I obeyed.

I blocked the line of the other person who received the offer after telling them that I could not meet anymore, but I received a message from the phone number and was contacted by the father who had received the offer before and had met.

You probably met a good dad

Is fun?

I'll give you three times as much as before, so why don't we eat something delicious together?

I came.
I'm honestly confused.
What would you do?

[URL]
https://universe-club.jp/help/questions/view/5878

【Answer】

Thank you very much for your question.

Masahiro Tanaka, who was challenging the major leagues, returned to his old home, the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles, this year.

His seven-year career in the majors must have been something that any baseball fan would have been excited about.

By the way, Masahiro Tanaka signed a large contract worth 2014 billion yen over 7 years in 160 and transferred to the Yankees. Do you know if you have it or not?

7 billion yen for 160 years literally means "I will pay 160 billion yen for a 7-year contract."The important thing here is that no matter how good or bad Tanaka's performance is, in principle the figure of 160 billion won in seven years will not change.

If Tanaka didn't get the results he expected, then this contract was a good deal for Tanaka.However, if Tanaka does better than expected, this contract could turn out to be a bad one.

For example, even if there is an offer from another team saying, "We will pay 500 billion yen!", Tanaka cannot transfer to that team during the contract period.

Instead of paying 160 billion yen no matter how bad your performance is, you will only pay 160 billion yen no matter how good your performance is.And during his contract period, he should not move even if other teams have good offers.This is the essence of the contract of 7 billion yen over 160 years.

breach of contract

I don't know how much the rent of the apartment you live in is, but let's say it's 20 yen.

Then, why is Papa offering the questioner an apartment that costs 20 yen?

Certainly, there must be a reason why Papa likes the questioner.But in this case, we must not forget another extremely important point.

That is the condition when the questioner signed a mistress contract with Papa.

"Stop being a dad".

In other words, Papa is offering an apartment of 20 yen to the questioner because he is "the questioner who quit dad life".If the questioner was not "the questioner who quit daddy activity" but "the questioner who continues daddy activity", we would not have provided an apartment with a rent of 20 yen. That's right.

Tanaka was able to sign a 7-year 160 billion contract because of his baseball skills and the condition that he would not go to another team for 160 years.If there had been a condition that he could transfer to another team in the middle, the amount of XNUMX billion yen would not have been paid to Tanaka.

Of course, in this case, there is no such thing as a clear written contract, but there is no need for a written document because there is no need to go to court.

At least from Papa's point of view, it's nothing but an unforgivable act of betrayal to the extent that he wants to retroactively demand the amount that he had paid for the questioner.If I only got kicked out of the apartment when I found out, I think I should be grateful to Papa-sama for his generosity.

It doesn't matter if the offer is 3x, 10x or 100x.When the questioner signed a mistress contract with his current dad, he signed a contract to "stop working as a dad" and "not meet other men."That doesn't change the fact that she signed a contract that she wouldn't switch even if there was a better offer.

Precisely because of that guarantee, Papa offered the questioner an apartment for 20 yen.

So at least I don't think it makes sense for the questioner to go to Papa three times.

I didn't say don't go

For the above reasons, I don't think it makes sense to even reply to Dad's offer three times as far as the person asking this question.

If you say you don't like it, you shouldn't have made a contract that you don't meet other men from the beginning.At least in my ethics, it is unacceptable to take the attitude of "I don't know that" even after signing a contract and receiving the reward.It doesn't matter if Papa has a mistress contract with another woman, or if she only comes to see her when she feels like it.This is because when Papa made a lover contract with the questioner, he probably did not promise that she would come to see her regularly and that she would not have another lover.If she is dissatisfied with her treatment, she should ask her current papa to reconsider her contract, and there is no reason to arbitrarily break the contract.

However, it is just a story that it is not allowed by "my ethics".The law does not guarantee the validity of such contracts, and social perception is another matter.

So if the person asking the question wants to see Papa three times, I won't stop him.

However, if you do meet, please do not forget that you have broken the contract.Even if the contract is not legally valid, the questioner is trying to unilaterally break the contract that was signed between humans with mutual consent.

And if I could only give one piece of advice to those who asked such questions, it would be better not to tell this story to the next dad. It's like saying, "I am a traitor."