[JP ONLY] Sugar Dating Anonymous Question Box

Male member

Taro

I'm in charge at night, but I don't have any questions today, so I'll leave it here.Well, it's fine if it's treated like a return trip in the morning.

Although it is a star rating, I think it is relatively reliable.As you pointed out, the key point is that it is "mechanically" calculated from "questionnaire evaluation = evaluation of members who actually met".In short, there is no arbitrariness on the part of the staff, and since membership is made up of multiple evaluations, it does not depend solely on the evaluations of specific individuals. Unlike Amazon, you can't operate it with Sakura posting.Furthermore, it has been tested and verified that it yields reasonable evaluations before implementation.I think it's a pretty neat feature.

On the other hand, it is better to consider what this evaluation represents.We can evaluate because we have a scale, and the evaluation will change if the scale is different.So, what constitutes a star rating is a woman who makes a high contribution to the service of the dating club, that is, a woman who receives many offers and is generally well-received by the men she meets.I think it's easier to understand if you think of it as a system similar to Mercari or Uber's driver evaluations.

Each evaluation is +2 to -2, and a woman with a ★5 is +7 or above, so a ★5 means that she has met at least 4 people.In terms of evaluation, there are probably more +2s than +1s, so it's actually a percentage higher than that.I think you can imagine what the situation would be like if you were in relationship type C or B2.I think it's a great opportunity for male members who "understand" that dating clubs implicitly assume multiple relationships, so they don't care about that and just want the woman to be attractive when they meet them. hey.

On the other hand, I think there are also male members who say, ``I want people to get along only with me,'' or ``I'm worried about the shadow of other men.''I don't deny that at all, and neither do I, but for those people, it's not an evaluation that should be taken seriously.Because the scale is different.Therefore, I think it would be a good idea for such male members to avoid women with high ★ ratings.I also tend to pay a little less attention to women with high ★ ratings.Of course, a low ★ rating doesn't necessarily mean it's good.It's not that I like high risk.You will be subject to scrutiny to see if you can overcome that risk.

I'm saying this because I think you're in the same category as me when it comes to feeling uncomfortable about the evaluation, but you want to be King Arthur without Excalibur.Well, I understand that you can't become a hero with success that is all arranged for you.So don't complain and do your best, think and act for yourself, bam bam bam bam ♪ (lol)

Taro

• Answer date: 2023/10/05 01:36

• iine

  5

ス タ ッ フ

Maezawa (Staff)

column article

Blog post

thanks for your questions.
Maezawa will also answer.

>If the calculation is based on this, I don't think it's very reliable, but what do you think?

If this is more than 50%, I think it becomes unreliable.
I think there are very few at this point.

For example, even if 1% of the total feedback is unreliable,
The remaining 99% are reliable, so I think the overall evaluation is generally reliable.

However, we have not measured what percentage is unreliable.

By the way, I wonder if I can rely on the star ratings in the world that much?
I sometimes think that
Even if I were a member, I don't think I would look at the star ratings.

Maybe I'll dare to offer something like 1 star?
The reason is that the unreliable star rating is low.
In fact, she might be a good woman if you meet her.
Or, it's possible that she just happens to be a good match for you.

When I think of a woman who might be a diamond in the rough,
Would you like to make an offer?

Of course, the profile is the main thing.
If the woman you thought was good to look at your profile has a low rating, this may be your chance.
I think.

By the way, until 5-6 years ago, there was almost no standard for raising star ratings.
(There was a standard that would be lowered if you were late or canceled at the last minute.)
There was a time when most women were 3 stars.

At the next stage, standards for rising stars were created.
Quick response to staff
There is something like

Within how many minutes is fast?
There is a difference depending on how the staff receives it.
In the same way, even if you reply quickly, there are women who get better stars and women who don't.
What does this evaluation mean?

Considering that there was a time when
I feel that the current mechanical evaluation is at least fair.

However, the man who was good on the first date
Even if you don't pay the allowance on the second date or lower the amount without permission.
There may also be a problem that you cannot give a bad review.

I think there is room for improvement.

• Answer date: 2023/10/04 15:07

• iine

  3

Male member

basil

Children with many ⭐︎s have a good personality, but I also think that they are children who receive many offers, and if they are C type or above, they will not refuse the offer the first time, so I use this as a reference.
For example, if the evaluation goes up or down, I interpret it as bullish because there are a lot of offers, so I avoid it.
On the other hand, there are many competitors who remain high and don't move, but I feel like I can do it for the time being.

When looking at a person's personality, look at the staff's impression and recommendation level rather than member ratings, which vary from different perspectives.

• Answer date: 2023/10/04 10:01

• iine

  2

Male member

Fuu

column article

If you say that
Aren't all online reviews the same?
Tabelog etc.
Google Maps etc.
Should I use it as a reference?
It is up to the person asking the question whether or not to do so.

By the way, I am a ☆4 woman.
I'll make an offer
☆Women who are stable at 5 years old get a lot of offers.
There seem to be a lot of rival dads.

But XNUMX is the default.
I think I'll hit a landmine too

☆If it is 4, some people will rate it as good.
I feel a little relieved because I'm doing it.
I thought there were no landmines lol

• Answer date: 2023/10/04 22:23

• iine

  2

Male member

Kazu

column article

Since there are some people who give such noise-like reviews, I think it has little effect on the number of stars.
I remember that such an explanation was given even when the system changed.

If you still think star ratings are unreliable, then you can personally ignore them.

• Answer date: 2023/10/04 07:49

• iine

  1